THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY is a compelling factual history of neoconservatism and its influence on US Foreign Policy in the Middle East during the first decade of the twenty-first century. Click on image above for details.

Thursday, September 10, 2009


As we arrive at the eighth anniversary of 9/11 we find that more and more people than ever before are finding themselves, at the very least, having serious doubts about the official version of events as told by the government and its agencies or, alternatively, are now utterly convinced that what happened on 11 September 2001 could not possibly have happened the way the government has told it. And, for many of those that at first believed what the government told them, the reality of having been lied to have been brought home to them, not so much by the science behind the destruction of WTCs 1 & 2, but by the blatant and obviously deliberate demolition of WTC7 on the same day.

The images of the aircraft crashing into the Twin Towers followed by the images of the Towers then collapsing into a massive pile of dust was seared into our collective memories. Most people were so busy trying to cope with the most bizarre sights they had ever seen that being told who was responsible for these terrible events almost as soon as they had happened also became indelibly etched in to our collective memories that for many it became difficult to rationalise what had happened or accept that their may be some other explanation for these events.

Add to this the fact that to believe anything other than the government’s version of events would be to completely and utterly surrender all of our notions of Western values and society. Unable to even contemplate such a life changing idea, most folk instantly put up barriers to prevent all those things that for our entire lives we had believed in from being demolished in the same way as the World Trade Center had been. To believe that our own government would be capable of being involved in any way whatsoever with such a horrendous act against its own people is utterly unpalatable to most people.

Time, however, has brought about change; not just changes in attitudes as the initial shock of what happened begins to fade into history, but changes in beliefs as time, as it inevitably does, brings us new hard evidence.

For most people, the collapse of the Twin Towers is still an event that is difficult perceive as having been caused by anything other than aircraft flying into them. Without being privy to scientific or engineering knowledge or skills, plus the trauma of having to cope with the inconceivable idea that our government could have had anything to with it, the refusal to accept that their maybe an alternative explanation to these events is quite understandably a normal response.

But as time went by, people slowly became aware of the fact that the Twin Towers weren’t the only buildings to come down that day. World Trade Center Building 7 also came down that day and it is the destruction of this building that has convinced so many that there is indeed far more to what happened on that day than the government is saying.

The 47 story building that was WTC7 collapsed at 5.20 in the afternoon of 11 September 2001. The official line is that the building collapsed as a result of a critical structural column on the 13th floor buckled which then triggered a catastrophic structural failure of the entire building which collapsed entirely into its own footprint. The problem with this explanation for the buildings collapse is that the photographic simply does not support it.

The several films showing the collapse of WTC7, films taken from various angles, show quite clearly that the building collapsed completely vertically, evenly and at free fall speed; a phenomenon completely consistent with a classic deliberate and professional building demolition and totally at odds with the theory that the failure of one column could have caused the building to have collapsed in this way.

To clinch it for many people has been the recent release of the latest film of the building collapsing which shows quite clearly explosions at various mid level floors simultaneously blowing out windows in the building the instant before it begins to collapse.

Here’s the clincher.

See for yourselves.


Anonymous said...

charlie sheen video message to obama


Anonymous said...

It is clearly a misrepresentation of current mainstream thinking to consider that the population is delving into crazy conspiracy theories.

Just last week, one of President Obama's senior adviser's had to resign because he had previously dabbled in 9/11 conspiracy theories. The public refuses to entertain such nonsense:

The main question for 9/11 conspiracy theorists is .... Is Obama and the Democracts in on this grand trick?

Damian Lataan said...

The only crazy conspiracy theory is the one the government told to the people in 'The 9/11 Commission Report'. Too shocked to argue, many people took it hook, line and sinker.

Now, after having had time to think about it, people are beginning to wake up to the reality that what happened on 9/11 could not possibly have happened the way the governemnt said it did.

Now the people want to know the truth. Being lied to to get a war going is one thing, but being lied to about something as horrific as 9/11 is something else.

Some people, not unsurprisingly, are reluctant to accept that the government could actually be involved in such a crime but, as the evidence slowly emerges, people are realising that they have no choice but to eventually confront the truth.

Anonymous said...

Are the Democrats in on this supposed government act on 9/11?

Is the Obama administration now complicit in its cover-up?

Damian Lataan said...

I have no idea if they were 'in on it' as you put it, but it does seem clear that they are complicit in preventing a full and open investigation of the new evidence and examination of the evidence that wasn't included in 'The 9/11 Commission Report' - like the demolition of WTC7. Read in to that whatever you like.

Anonymous said...

So the Bush-hating Democrats, who loathed the former President with a passion and were aching to bring him down with whatever means possible, were secretly willing to really cover up this monumental mass murder of American citizens by the government it despised?

Damian Lataan said...

Who said the Democrats hated Bush? They voted with the Republicans for Bush to go to war against the Iraqi people.

They were 'aching' to bring Bush down so they could enjoy political power themselves. There's nothing in it for them for exposing what actually happened on 9/11.

There are very few ideological differences between Democrats and Republicans and most are believers in the official story while others privately harbor doubts which they dare not share publicly.

Anonymous said...

The Democrats were one half of the Chair of the 9/11 Report.

Were they complicit in this stifling of the supposed truth?

Damian Lataan said...

No less so than the other half. There's very little difference between the two when it comes to big politics in the US

IDHolm said...

G'day Damian,

'nice' post. I was planning to add a comment - but it just grew & grew, far beyond the blogger 4096-char limit. Hate to 'pimp' for another site, but see my item here - if you wish.

IDHolm said...

G'day again Damian,

I ran into this as a comment to PCR's "Another War in the Works,America Is Led And Informed By Liars." I quote it verbatim:

further w. re. to


(CINCINNATTI, Ohio) - When 9/11 Commission Chief Counsel, John Farmer, released his book, The Ground Truth, debunking his own 9/11 commission report and was supported by Chairman Thomas Kean and commission member Senator Bob Kerrey with no dissent, the cover story of 9/11 died.

This leaves us with these inescapable facts:

* We no longer have an official answer to questions about 9/11.

* Perjured testimony and falsified information given to the original commission is a criminal act and demands a Grand Jury investigation and Special Prosecutor.

* Hundreds of respected leaders of the military, law enforcement, intelligence and scientific communities question the credibility of an investigation now proven beyond a doubt a conspiracy in itself.

* The institutions of government, including all 3 branches, Executive, Judicial and Legislative have combined in an unexplainable way in their failure to respond to circumstances that legally require action.

* The press has continued a pattern of distortion of facts, suppression of news and has engaged in a systematic campaign of deception.

the most corrupt and debased groups involved in the 9/11 coverup are being actively recruited by the press as a patriotic resistance.

The tone for the coverup is being set by Australian media mogul, Rupert Murdoch, who controls much of the press in the US and United Kingdom. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see Murdoch's role in covering up 9/11. His networks created the "9/12ers" who are continuing the coverup and Murdoch employees like Fox funnyman, Glenn Beck, are still a major part of the effort to protect those in government who lied to the commission and may have aided the conspirators.

Murdoch's media has held to "party line" on 9/11 and the Iraq/Afghanistan war since day one, suppressing facts any time they threatened an agenda of broad regional war or supported limiting government power to operate above the law. 09.php
pippi | 09.29.09 - 2:08 pm | #