THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY is a compelling factual history of neoconservatism and its influence on US Foreign Policy in the Middle East during the first decade of the twenty-first century. Click on image above for details.

Saturday, March 11, 2006


by Sid Walker

On Jan 16th 2006, Hamish Alcorn, Editor of Webdiary, a popular independent Australian weblog posted a clarification on the site in response to a direct challenge from Geoff Pahoff, one of the regular posters on Webdiary - a contributor with a strong commitment to the Zionist cause. Geoff’s first sentence was a direct quotation from an earlier post I had made on Webdiary.
(See for all the relevant exchanges.)

The form of Hamish’s reply was to quote Geoff Pahoff’s post, then reply in bold text. It ran as follows:

Those Bloody Zionist Threats Again
Submitted by Geoff Pahoff on January 16, 2006 - 8:41pm.
Then threats by Zionists against WD might subside -
Hamish, has WD received what in any way could be described as threats and that could be said to be from "Zionists”? Even if we used the, shall we say, very broad definition of the term Zionists obviously intended by the author [Sid Walker] of this charming little allegation?
Hamish: no.
Is your editorial policy on Holocaust denial the result of threats or pressure from Zionists?
Hamish: no.
If so, could you please provide details of this? If not could you say so please? Otherwise this allegation is left hanging in the air unanswered. Perhaps we should consider the pernicious consequences of allowing these things to pass by in silence.

So, Hamish 'clarified' the matter for Webdiary readers. No Zionist threats. No intimidation. My allegation must have its origins in my fetid imagination and had no basis in fact. Nothing to see here, folks! Move along!

And yet.... here's an extract from an email I received from Hamish, dated 12th September 2005:

"Particularly on holocaust / Zionist stuff, Webdiary has gone there before, and for her trouble Margo received death-threats and extraordinary harassment. Note that no other media will touch it. It certainly does say something about our society."

Here's another extract from an email I received from Hamish on 29th September 2005:

"Yes, we’re in a fucked up society and can’t say whatever we want. Do you want us to lose any voice we have? My sister is being accused of bullshit NOW for what is already said by VERY POWERFUL PEOPLE. Some would say an indication she’s doing something right..."

One doesn't need an IQ of 200 to figure out there's 100% inconsistency between Hamish's personal emails to me and the 'clarification' he posted on Webdiary. Both cannot be true. At least one of his statements must be untrue. There is a three-letter word for this: Hamish has been caught out telling a... fib.

If, as I suspect, Hamish was truthful when he described the ugly pressure brought to bear against Margo and Webdiary, then he is foolish to deny it so publicly.

Death threats should be reported to the police (don't we have an 'anti-terror' squad these days?). The last thing one should do, in the face of death threats, is to deny they ever happened. It encourages this thuggish, illegal type of behaviour.

Of course, my suspicion might be wrong. Hamish may be telling Webdiary readers the unvarnished truth, while amusing himself by occasionally spinning entirely fallacious horror stories in private emails.

Either way, it's not behaviour one expects from the Editor of a publication whose motto is "Webdiary - Independent, Ethical, Accountable and Transparent"

Margo Kingston, Hamish's sister who founded Webdiary but has since retired, was more laconic and not so unsubtle when applying WD's bizarre censorship rules.

Here are Webdiary's 'no-go' topics again:
1. Denial of the existence of the Holocaust.
2. Allegations that a Western power or powers were behind at the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001
3. "False flag" theories.

In the Garden of Eden, there was but one forbidden fruit.

These days we have a bunch of three :-)


Anonymous said...

"No-go" topics. Isn't it funny how this Zionist government and its bully enforcement organizations such as the ADL always suppress the truth? The truth is self-evident. They must use laws, repression, bully tactics and guilt to suppress it. Always. I love the saying "truth stands the test of time while lies are soon exposed." It's time to start jap-slapping the zionists. I speak up every chance I get and I don't care who gets pissed off. Screw political correctness. It is destroying the United States of America. If the Zionists don't like American's exercising their first amendment rights, they should move to another pea sized country in the middle east which has no free speech.

Monsignor Dornigan said...

The Nurembeg trials were 90% Jews

Anonymous said...

I note some comments you have posted about Jay White and C. Parsons.

C Parsons is Chris Parsons, Media Relations Officer at Manly Council in NSW, and he spends most of his time online -- at the expense of Manly ratepayers -- defaming and villifying Arabs, Muslims, and anyone who dares to criticise the brutal and racist policies and practices of Israel.

Much of this illegal ratepayer-funded activity has been directed at Indymedia:

As the recipient of several thousand ratepayer-funded defamatory attacks, I am planning to sue Chris Parsons and Manly Council.

qrswave said...

It makes you wonder what they're hiding...

Poseidon said...

Holocaustianity, a relatively new religion, persists amongst a dwindling lunatic fringe of the uneducated, the technophobic, the gullible, and the terminally clueless. Holocaustians - also known as "reality deniers" - obtain their 'information' from a diet of Hollywood movies, newspapers, and government propaganda. Their bizarre beliefs are also circulated by word of mouth. Those deniers who have computers use them for gaming, gambling, or downloading porn; their intellectual sloth is not conducive to self-education.

Early attempts to introduce Holocaustianity's kernel - a hoax of "six
million" dead or dying Jews - failed, when global conditions did not include the prerequisite critical mass of corrupt world leaders. In June 1900, for example, Rabbi Stephen Wise spoke of "6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering
arguments in favour of zionism" (zionism being a Machiavellian geopolitical get-immensely-rich-steadily scheme featuring the fomenting of racial and
religious hatred in order to establish a global dictatorship; q.v. Another botched attempt to kickstart the myth was in 1919, when few believed Martin Glynn's claims of "six million" starving Jews. In 1936, Chaim Weizmann told of "six million"
Jews in Europe who were unwanted and effectively sentenced to be imprisoned.

The derivation of the "six million" is an ancient Jewish prophecy, which predicts the return of the Jews to the "Promised Land" after the loss of six
million of their number. Specifically, the six stems from the sixth letter "vav" in the Hebrew alphabet or alefbet. Six is the number of man in the
Jewish tradition, since vav is said to be a picture of man. Man was supposedly created on the sixth day, works for six days of the week, and the "beast" has the "number of a man" - 666. Six billion deaths would be credible only to utter nincompoops; six thousand would be too insignificant to yield appreciable income and political capital. Hence, six million was
chosen as a figure that almost everyone could agree on.

The few who had been duped by the pre-WWII scams did provide some cash. However, the crooked zionist mafia were already immensely rich by the time of Glynn's assertions, through seizing control of US and European central banks and newspapers, and looting Russia in the Bolshevik Revolution. Nowadays these crime supremos will not even get out of bed for
anything less than a billion dollars.

It was not until the zionists had instigated a Second World War which killed in excess of fifty million that these genocidal gangsters tricked the world into providing them with their own sovereign state, and into allowing the establishment of a new religion that would be employed to stifle all
opposition. Control of their own state - "Israel" in occupied Palestine - would furnish a base for terrorist (Mossad) training camps, nuclear weapons, and the zionist international crime syndicate.

By around 2001, Israel's arsenal had extended to several German-built,
diesel-powered submarines fitted with nuclear-tipped modified cruise missiles with a 900-mile range. Their spying skills, and ability to get close to political leaders, were already second to none. Hence, the zionist mafia were then able to bribe, blackmail and terrorise other states into supplying their own armed forces as Israel's private mercenaries or proxy armies, invading and attacking its oil and water-rich enemy neighbouring states. The pretexts would range from truly asinine claims, e.g. of "WMDs" and "evil dictators" with "industrial shredders", to more elaborate schemes
involving remote-controlled unmanned planes and multi-billion-dollar insurance frauds featuring skyscrapers felled by strategically placed thermite charges.

Mohammed Is A Woman, Peace Be Upon Her said...

Mamoud Abbas is our Angry Arab of the day. You go girl!

Palestinian Chairiman Mamoud Abbas looked like an Angry Arab today after learning of Israels detention of five Palestinian terrorists jailed for the murder of Israeli minister Rehavam Ze'evi in 2001. When asked about the predicament, Chairman Abbas said: I keep telling my people, the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon Her, is a Jewish woman, which means we need to play nice with the Zionist pigs, I mean, our Jewish neighbors. When asked for further comment, Abbas said simply: David Lee Roth should have never left Van Halen.

Anonymous said...

30 Days as a Muslim in America - Video

A white, Christian, American who goes to 'live as a Muslim' for 30 days.

Google Video: 30 Days as a Muslim in America