I doubt very much if Jews throughout the Diaspora will be much impressed by a call by Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, chief rabbi of Safed, for the Israeli state to execute the children of the perpetrator of the attack on the Mercaz Harav yeshiva in revenge of that attack.
One would have thought that, having once been on the receiving end of such crimes toward the middle of the last century, that such nonsense is not something that any Jewish person, regardless of their extremism, would tolerate.
After all that European Jewry went through, the world has to put up with this stuff? And this bloke calls himself a rabbi?
AUSTRALIANS AT WAR
THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY is a compelling factual history of neoconservatism and its influence on US Foreign Policy in the Middle East during the first decade of the twenty-first century. Click on image above for details.
11 comments:
The Nazis called it "sippenhaft." The new Nazis are Jewish, isn't that ironic? Actually, the Zionists are much worse than the Nazis. Remember that the greatest mass murderer known to history was a Jew: Lazar Kaganovich, who killed 5,000,000 Ukrainians.
You haven't been paying attention. The original Iraq war/terror campaign was ordered by israel because Saddam was paying a $25k stipend to Palestinians who's houses were demolished by the Jews. Then there was Lebanon. Have you been sleeping in a cave? Wait 'til 'Iran' arrives. You ain't seen nothin' yet.
The Jews in Israel have been executing Palestinian children for decades. What the rabbi is advocating is nothing new!
Now if he had advocated executing all the Palestinians in retribution that would be newsworthy! Or would it?
Actually this isn't a Nazi invention. The Communists under Stalin practiced this sort of thing all the time.
What are you trying to say? If Stalin did this sort of stuff then it's OK for the Israeli Zionist loons to do it as well??!!
Stalinism
Zionism
Fascism
And since when was Stalin a 'Communist'? He was no more a Communist than Hitler was a Socialist - not even a National Socialist.
I personally reckon that Marxist North Korea has the worst policy when it comes to executing children.
With gas.
In front of their political dissident parents:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3461935.stm
First off, I think I'd be wanting to see a bit more evidence than the word of some defecting N. Korean 'intelligence' officer before putting this story in the 'history' box and removing it from the 'propaganda' box.
Second, as per my response to the previous comment above, what point are you trying to make? Are you saying that, if it's OK for N. Korea to do this sort of thing then it's OK for the Zionist loonies to do it as well?
And, finally, since when has N.K. been a 'Marxist' state? It's nothing anywhere near a 'Marxist' state. It's a Fascist state. You seem to be putting labels on ideologies that suits the whims of right-wing propganda and rhetoric rather than the geopolitical reality.
There is far more credible evidence than desperate N Korean refugees as to the violations occuring as part of North Korea's despicable system of government.
(when they're not summarily executing refugees, as this BBC broadcast footage smuggled from that sicko state displays:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6R3UeqYinF4)
According to Human Rights Watch:
"All prisoners are subjected to forced labor and face cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment; many die in prison because of mistreatment, malnutrition, and lack of medical care. Torture appears to be endemic."
http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2006/01/18/nkorea12255.htm
As for their political ideoloy, Kim contended that although Marxism-Leninism was valid as the fundamental law of revolution, there required the introduction of Juche as a new moderator, but NEVER to replace the "true", original path.
And yes, it is a Fascist Totalitarian state. This is neither here nor there as pertaining to Leftist or Rightist ideology. Both extremes have produced totalitarian outcomes.
In fact, there has never been a single example of a Marxist inspired state that has allowed multi-party pluralism. We've seen (actually, more like digging up) the horrific results from Ethiopia and Cambodia. Cuba does not even bother allowing dissenting opinion to be propagated.
Reporters Sans Frontieres in 2003 listed Cuba as the worst state in the world for dissenting journos.Today it's not much better:
"In 2006, Cuba is still the second biggest prison in the world for journalists"
http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=367
Intolerance, manifested in its ultimate guise as totalitarianism, is found on the far Left as much as the far Right.
So, what's your point? How does all this excuse Israeli Zionist loonies advocating the killing of children? What has what's happening elsewhere in the world got to do with what these loons want to do?
Was just following the comments in the thread.
Anyway, as for the original post, of course that guy is a loon.
As much as the ethically corrupt scumbags on the other side who actually DO smash kids' skulls in:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A2740-2003May17¬Found=true
And their religious leaders who glorify them:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1157913614980&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Anyone who smashes any kid’s skull in is a scum bag regardless of whose ‘side’ they happen to be on. What has being on one ‘side’ or another got to do with it?
Besides, this particular Israeli Zionist loon isn’t just a religious leader who is glorifying this sort of crime; he’s a religious leader who is actually advocating that the crime be committed.
Post a Comment