THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY is a compelling factual history of neoconservatism and its influence on US Foreign Policy in the Middle East during the first decade of the twenty-first century. Click on image above for details.

Friday, June 05, 2009


Israeli MK Aryeh Eldad, of the extreme right-wing Zionist National Union party, was quoted in Arutz Sheva Israel National News yesterday as saying:

“Obama makes a shocking parallel between the destruction of European Jewry and the suffering that the Arabs of Israel brought upon themselves when they declared war on Israel. If Obama does not understand the difference between them, perhaps he will understand it better when he visits the Buchenwald concentration camp in the comings days. And if he doesn’t understand it even there, then Islam will once again teach it to him, just as it taught his predecessor on 9/11.”

Eldad is clearly saying that, if Obama doesn’t come on side with Israel then ‘Islam’ could very well do another 9/11 job on the US. However, since we now know that there is a whole lot more to the 9/11 story than the simplistic ‘Islam did it’ meme to the point that it now seems that, at the very least, if ‘Islam did it’ then they did it in conjunction with people who had far more skills and influence than Islam alone could possibly have ever mustered, then Eldad’s threat needs to be taken very seriously indeed.

For most people on the planet the destruction of WTC7 and the latest evidence showing traces of Thermite or a related demolition product being found in the rubble of WTC1&2 has become the clincher that is swinging more and more people away from the official conspiracy theory of al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden having been solely responsible. Most logical thinking people have come to the conclusion, as unpalatable as it may be, that forces far more powerful than Islamic extremists were responsible for 9/11. Could it be that Eldad is so familiar with those forces that he is confident enough to make the kind of thinly veiled threat that he has?


traducteur said...

False-flag operations mounted by the Zionazis are an old story, to be sure, but they're also a self-satisfied lot who think they're more important than they really are. Let's not make the mistake of taking them too seriously.

Barbara L said...

There are so many false leads in the words of yet another Israeli one does not know where to begin. But then, in their hubris, they believe we all swallow their party line and speak to us as such.

They have been rewriting history for a long time and that is why it is so important that we find and put out the truth of those lies. This is one of my goals.

traducteur, it is easy to be glib about not taking them too seriously but this is a threat that must be dealt with. They are very serious and it is end time of their millennium of plotting and scheming. They are very serious about bringing their god Lucifer into the world and that is no light undertaking.

Their work is changing our world too swiftly to ignore them.

What blows me away in this story is ... it is proven Mossad is the premier force in pulling off 911, that PNAC is an offshoot of an Israeli document, that Israel is woven through everything. And they STILL perpetrate the Muslim threat. So who was he threatening on behalf of? The Zionists.. or the Zionists in keffayahs?

IDHolm said...

Very interesting. It's certainly no coincidence, that we keep looping back to the same things. I recall watching - in abject horror, not 'just' one but *both* towers falling sooo straight down, sooo exactly - into their own 'footprints.' I can still see, in my mind's eye, the TV tower on one of the towers descending sooo geometrically perfectly, vertically, into the dust-clouds of almost incomprehensible, utter and complete destruction. Then WTC7 fell, although we didn't see it - if it was broadcast at all; we'd long since turned our own TV off, and wandered away in sick despair.

Fazit: to 'believe' that those *3*, not the two 'obvious' ones; but that 3rd, the one that a) wasn't hit by any plane and b) was internally of *asymmetric* construction - but nevertheless c) it too, fell sooo perfectly vertically, is to 'believe' in the utterly *inconceivable*.

Nature is just not like that. Once, perhaps, in a squillion years - but 3, all in su-u-uch a nice, *perfect* neat row? Try telling it to a judge. Oh, yeah; as if that wasn't enough, they shipped the evidence off - on a fast boat to China - almost instantly getting rid of - all the 'remains.' Destruction of crime-scene evidence, anyone?

Then some snot Israeli MK comes along, and threatens "... then Islam will once again teach it to him, just as it taught his predecessor on 9/11." To copy'n paste from my own article of today «Wha-a-at!!?»

As Damian (g'day) rightly queries, Q: How could this snot Israeli MK be «confident enough to make the kind of thinly veiled threat» - that he did? A: Two; (1) either this Eldad is intimately in contact with the 9/11 Islamic perpetrators themselves (and more; knows that they're capable of a repeat) - or (2) this Eldad is intimately in contact with the perpetrators - who were(are) a bit 'closer to home;' i.e. not quite so Islamic as he's intimated...

Anonymous said...