You could be forgiven for thinking that the Israeli extreme right must
be nuts for being so obsessed about Iran when the Islamic State (IS), a far
more bloodthirsty and ruthless organisation that borders on being an
anarchistic-fascist organisation hell bent on destroying anything and
everything that doesn’t conform to its beliefs, is almost at Israel’s northern
borders. Rest assured, however, that there is method in Israel’s apparent
madness.
The Israelis for years, indeed, long before IS came along, have
considered Iran as their mortal enemy accusing them of wanting nothing less
than the destruction of Israel. To reinforce this notion, Israel accuses Iran
of developing nuclear weapons for the sole purpose of attacking and destroying
Israel. Israel says that ‘Iran is an existential threat’ to Israel, a call
repeated only recently by Netanyahu when he addressed the US Congress in
Washington on Tuesday 4 March 2015.
The world, on the other hand, tends to think differently. Apart from
the fact that there is no evidence whatsoever that Iran has a nuclear weapons
program, the US, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany, the so-called
P5+1, believe that Iran can be prevented from the possibility of moving toward being
nuclear armed by a mixture of negotiation and sanctions. These negotiations,
instigated by the US under Obama’s administration, have all but destroyed
Israel’s aspirations to get the US to attack Iran ostensibly to destroy Iran’s
nuclear facilities but in reality to affect regime change in Iran.
For Israel and their Republican and neoconservative supporters in the
US, regime change in Iran is essential because it would strip Israel’s enemies
at home, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, of
their ability to resist Israeli aspirations to create a Greater Israel that
includes annexing the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and possibly even southern
Lebanon up to the Litani River. Regime change in Iran will also effectively put
a halt to Iranian hegemony and influence throughout other regions of the Middle
East including Syria, Iraq and the Yemen. This would then allow a right-wing
led future US government to launch a full-scale offensive against IS and what
remains of Bashir al-Assad’s government in Syria while Israel launch all-out
attacks against Hamas and Hezbollah.
All this though requires a change of political scenery in the US; a
change that could well occur at the next US Presidential election in November
of next year.
Jeb Bush, George W. Bush’s brother, has already thrown his hat in the
ring for nomination as the Republican candidate and has taken on advisors who
are well known Zionist supporting neoconservatives. Israel has an election
coming up on 17 March this year and it is likely that the right-wing of Israeli
politics will prevail with Netanyahu a strong possibility of retaining the
Prime Ministership and, if not Netanyahu, then, in what I consider to be the
worst case scenario, the Zionist extremist Avigdor Liebermann who has called
for regime change in Iran, the invasion and annexation of the Gaza Strip and
the West Bank, and the destruction of Hezbollah.
It seems clear to me that the purpose of Netanyahu’s provocative speech
to Congress last Tuesday was to pave the way for a drastic realignment of US
foreign policy after the US Presidential elections in 2016, a realignment that
favours Israeli plans for the future of the Middle East returning hegemony
firmly back in the hands of the US and Israel and rendering Iran’s influence
null and void thus realising Israel’s dream of creating a Greater Israel.
3 comments:
I appreciate every step you shared. Feel free to visit my website;
Hello. We provide helpful information in your life.
Take a look and go.This is an impressive post.
Post a Comment