Apparently the Israelis are very upset over the fact that unexploded ordnance that the Israelis dropped on the Gaza during their last criminal onslaught into the ghetto, and subsequently gathered up by Hamas, has gone missing or, as the Israelis would have us believe, ‘stolen’.
Never mind that this ordnance was delivered by Israel to Hamas’s door, literally in most cases, but now they accuse Hamas of stealing it. The inference is they actually want it back once the UN discovers where it’s been taken to!
I’m sure Hamas will find a way of returning the explosives to Israel. One shouldn’t be surprised if it is via the same way as it was delivered to Hamas – by air mail. One can only hope that in doing so it causes less damage than when it was first used. At least the message will get through.
AUSTRALIANS AT WAR
THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY is a compelling factual history of neoconservatism and its influence on US Foreign Policy in the Middle East during the first decade of the twenty-first century. Click on image above for details.
3 comments:
On 9 Feb, UN Mines Advisory Group teams removed and destroyed white phosphorus wedges discovered by young Palestinian students their school in Tal El Hawa, Gaza.
This was reported by the UN OCHA, but was the report spread far and wide by the MSM? No.
According to the IDF their enemies 'stole' some unexploded(i.e. failed) ordnance. Within hours the IDF's spin is spread all over the world by the MSM.
HI Damian,
Remember this post:
"BOMBS LOADED ONTO F16L JETS OF I.A.F. 119 SQUADRON WERE ‘TAMPERED WITH’ AT TIME OF SYRIAN BOMBING"
http://lataan.blogspot.com/2008/11/bombs-loaded-onto-f16l-jets-of-iaf-119.html
In fact, no uranium-tipped Israeli bombs at all. Not according to the United Nations:
"In a separate report released this week, the IAEA said traces of uranium taken from the site of an alleged nuclear reactor in Syria were man-made, and rejected the Syrian Government's claim that the uranium had come from Israeli missiles used to destroy the site in 2007."
http://www.theage.com.au/world/iran-has-enough-uranium-for-bomb-un-20090220-8dnw.html?page=-1
In fact the IAEA did not reject the ‘Syrians claim that the uranium traces had come from the missiles that the Israelis used’ as reported in ‘The Age’ as you cite, rather the IAEA report stated: “The agency's current assessment is that there is a low probability that the uranium was introduced by the use of missiles…”
“…low probability” is a bit different than ‘reject’ out of hand as you imply.
The IAEA report also says, incidentally, that Israel was ’uncooperative’ with the IAEA in their investigations into the Syria allegations.
Post a Comment