tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7708970.post117386698289706074..comments2024-01-25T12:33:03.851+10:30Comments on Telling the History of the Twenty-First Century as it Really Is: 9/11: THERE ARE FAR MORE QUESTIONS THAN THE GOVERNMENT CAN PROVIDE ANSWERS FOR.Damian Lataanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06886295381135372084noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7708970.post-1173931227462500862007-03-15T15:30:00.000+10:302007-03-15T15:30:00.000+10:30Anonymous, you ask: "Would a three or four mile de...Anonymous, you ask: "Would a three or four mile debris radius be more in line with what you imagine a jet coming down like that would provoke?" You say '...like that', like what?<BR/><BR/>The government said that the aircraft was in one piece when it impacted the ground. I would expect to see a very big hole in the ground. I would not expect to find debris over a three mile radius.<BR/><BR/>All the evidence points toward the aircraft having broken up in mid-air which is contrary to the governments story.Damian Lataanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06886295381135372084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7708970.post-1173871350660554582007-03-14T22:52:00.000+10:302007-03-14T22:52:00.000+10:30Sorry if my comment was confusing - I was not "say...Sorry if my comment was confusing - I was not "saying" anything. I was asking a question.<BR/><BR/>"Would a three or four mile debris radius be more in line with what you imagine a jet coming down like that would provoke?"<BR/><BR/>Perhaps if I phrased the question like this:<BR/><BR/>Would debris being spread over a large area be more what one would expect from an airliner coming down than a small hole?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7708970.post-1173869687934932012007-03-14T22:24:00.000+10:302007-03-14T22:24:00.000+10:30Are you now saying that the aircraft impacted vert...Are you now saying that the aircraft impacted vertically then exploded on impact hurling debris over a three mile radius? Do you not think an aircraft weighing some 115 tonnes would leave a bigger hole in that scenario?Damian Lataanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06886295381135372084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7708970.post-1173868960458343382007-03-14T22:12:00.000+10:302007-03-14T22:12:00.000+10:30Would a three or four mile debris radius be more i...Would a three or four mile debris radius be more in line with what you imagine a jet coming down like that would provoke?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7708970.post-1173868565531047212007-03-14T22:06:00.000+10:302007-03-14T22:06:00.000+10:30Three or four miles??!! But didn't the government ...Three or four miles??!! But didn't the government tell us that the aircraft impacted the ground in one piece? Wreakage strewn over three or four miles would indicate that the aircraft broke up in mid-air - and at a fairly high altitude. That's definitely not what the government told us.<BR/><BR/>Even more unanswered questions. See how the plot thickens as the governments story falls to bits - in this case literally.Damian Lataanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06886295381135372084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7708970.post-1173867657196030102007-03-14T21:50:00.000+10:302007-03-14T21:50:00.000+10:30The second video (on Flight 93 crash site) opens b...The second video (on Flight 93 crash site) opens by announcing the debris is spread over a "three or four mile" area.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com